Skip to main content

I have to agree that these T-shirts- both of them- are funny

The problem- and it's a big one- is that too many people on both ends of the political spectrum don't have a sense of humor. They either don't laugh at good-natured, hyperbolic ribbing along ideological lines, or- probably more common and even worse- don't realize that it's a joke.

That said, what the "Powerline" post has to say needs expanding on. The thing is a two-edged sword.

I've spent a lot of time on this blog criticizing Donald Trump, whom I believe is a true threat to our democratic values, the moral survival (and perhaps he actual survival) of the Republican party, the Bill of Rights, the moral and spiritual condition of our nation, and perhaps even our national security. Let it be said that I also think that Bernie Sanders (even more than Hillary Clinton) is naive, economically illiterate, and would also be a disaster as president.

But he is not a Marxist, as people I like and respect repeatedly claim. And while I agree that his values are a threat to the values of the Bill of Rights- that's true of the values of the totalitarian Left generally- Bernie, unlike Trump, has never overtly encouraged violence against those who disagree with him. I don't know the man, and I may misread him entirely, but I see him as a woefully misguided and intellectually befuddled but good-hearted man who is simply wrong about practically everything.

Bernie and The Donald are not the same. Not remotely. For one thing, misguided as they very often are, Bernie has both convictions and a conscience. But the proverb about the boy who cried "Wolf!" applies here. If we take hyperbole seriously, and call Bernie a Marxist and actually believe those comparisons to Lenin and so forth, people might actually end up voting for somebody like Donald Trump in the primaries and there might be a danger of his becoming his party's nominee for president. After all, people might reason, the stuff people say about him is only so much hyperbole, isn't it?

I don't think The Donald is going to open concentration camps any more than Bernie Sanders is going to collectivize Iowa farms. I don't think Trump knows enough about the Constitution or history or the art of governing a nation to have evil, totalitarian intentions, either. But while there are lots of silly people in  back of Bernie Sanders, essentially the motivation out of which the operate is misguided sympathy for the underdog.

The motivations and emotions to which Trump appeals and which fuel his campaign to say the least are far less admirable And if our penchant for not simply humorously engaging in but actually believing over-the-top rhetoric has numbed us to the point where we actually can't tell the difference, our nation is in even deeper trouble than I think it is.

By all means, let's laugh at each other. The trick is  not to lose our capacity for recognizing when ii's a joke and when it's  no longer funny.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…