Skip to main content

The Great Doofus Rebellion of 2016

Almost identical percentages of Republican voters say that they will refrain from voting for a 2016 GOP nominee who is or who is not Donald Trump. Some of the polls, of course, say that the percentage who would not vote for Trump is even higher.

But either way, for a third of the party rank-and-file to desert it in November would certainly doom it to a crushing defeat which would probably cost it at least one and possibly both houses of Congress, as well as numerous governorships and state legislatures. And no matter what happens at Cleveland, at this point, such a rebellion appears inevitable. An election the Republicans simply could not lose has been transformed by Trump and the Great Doofus Rebellion of 2016 into a certain disaster.

I am one of the anti-Trump crowd. And our opposition to Il Duce goes far beyond simply not voting for him. It's hard for me- and for a lot of us- to imagine continuing to consider ourselves Republicans if Trump is the nominee. An authoritarian, racist, radically unqualified demagogue would not simply be a dangerous man to have in the White House. I- and many others- simply want no part of an association with a political party that would nominate such a person. The moral stain on the Republican brand inflicted by the nomination of Trump might linger for a generation. It might never go away.

I had already switched my registration to Independent in disgust at the absolute nuttiness of fellow Republican activists after serving on the County Central Committee. On Caucus Night here in Iowa, I filled out the papers to switch back. But a few weeks ago I got them back in the mail. I had forgotten to sign them. I was instructed to do so and mail them back to the county elections office.

Well, I'm hanging on to them. If Trump is the nominee, they go not into the mailbox but into the garbage. And I am not alone.  Large numbers of Republicans all over the nation are determined to stop being Republicans if Donald Trump is the nominee.

It seems clearer now than ever that what I wrote so sadly last month is true: the Party's over. Not only is this election already lost, but it's hard to see how Trump supporters and those of us  in the #NeverTrump camp can share a party going forward.

I can understand the angry voters who support Ted Cruz. I really can. I disagree with them, but I can understand them. Cruz is the symbol of the kind of aggressive, uncompromising "in your face" conservatism so many of the Republican rank-and-file have pined for in recent years. But the Trump phenomenon is another animal. It's wholly irrational. All this support for an erratic, unstable demagogue who  thinks that judges sign bills, says irresponsible and even ridiculous things with predictable regularity, and probably couldn't pass a test to become a U.S. citizen is explicable only if we see him as nothing more or less than an outlet for the evil in the human soul. I, for one, have no desire to share a party with the people who support him- who can support him. No matter what the electoral consequences, they are a cancer on the party the GOP  cannot live with. The trouble is that it's not at all clear that it can survive the operation to remove it.

And so the Supreme Court will be lost, possibly forever. Roe v. Wade, Obergefell v. Hodges, and a host of other logically indefensible examples of amendment of the U.S. Constitution by judicial fiat will be set in stone. The Constitution itself will be in mortal danger. Hillary Clinton will be president for at least four years, and it's not at all clear that there will be a coherent opposition to her either during that time or when the 2020 election rolls around.

The consequences of the Great Doofus Rebellion of 2016 were not so serious, the whole thing would be funny.


Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

Reflections on the present and future of my Blackhawks

As this season from hell creeps to its close at an excruciating pace and makes all of us devote more of our attention to spring training for the Cubs than we otherwise might, there are calls for the heads of Blackhawks GM Stan Bowman and even the greatest coach in Blackhawks history, Joel Quenneville.

No general manager or coach could have made Marian Hossa and Corey Crawford healthy or prevented Toews and Keith and Saad from having the worst seasons of their careers or foreseen that a series of trades most of which made perfect sense at the time wouldn't pan out. The Hawks are one season removed from the second-best regular season in their history. This will be the first time in a decade that they haven't made the playoffs.

With the exception of the Pens, maybe the Kings and (for different reasons) the Golden Knights, every other team in the NHL would kill to have won three Stanley Cups in the past decade. In fact, only the Hawks, the Pens, the Kings, the Wings, and the Brui…