Skip to main content

The Great Doofus Rebellion of 2016

Almost identical percentages of Republican voters say that they will refrain from voting for a 2016 GOP nominee who is or who is not Donald Trump. Some of the polls, of course, say that the percentage who would not vote for Trump is even higher.

But either way, for a third of the party rank-and-file to desert it in November would certainly doom it to a crushing defeat which would probably cost it at least one and possibly both houses of Congress, as well as numerous governorships and state legislatures. And no matter what happens at Cleveland, at this point, such a rebellion appears inevitable. An election the Republicans simply could not lose has been transformed by Trump and the Great Doofus Rebellion of 2016 into a certain disaster.

I am one of the anti-Trump crowd. And our opposition to Il Duce goes far beyond simply not voting for him. It's hard for me- and for a lot of us- to imagine continuing to consider ourselves Republicans if Trump is the nominee. An authoritarian, racist, radically unqualified demagogue would not simply be a dangerous man to have in the White House. I- and many others- simply want no part of an association with a political party that would nominate such a person. The moral stain on the Republican brand inflicted by the nomination of Trump might linger for a generation. It might never go away.

I had already switched my registration to Independent in disgust at the absolute nuttiness of fellow Republican activists after serving on the County Central Committee. On Caucus Night here in Iowa, I filled out the papers to switch back. But a few weeks ago I got them back in the mail. I had forgotten to sign them. I was instructed to do so and mail them back to the county elections office.

Well, I'm hanging on to them. If Trump is the nominee, they go not into the mailbox but into the garbage. And I am not alone.  Large numbers of Republicans all over the nation are determined to stop being Republicans if Donald Trump is the nominee.

It seems clearer now than ever that what I wrote so sadly last month is true: the Party's over. Not only is this election already lost, but it's hard to see how Trump supporters and those of us  in the #NeverTrump camp can share a party going forward.

I can understand the angry voters who support Ted Cruz. I really can. I disagree with them, but I can understand them. Cruz is the symbol of the kind of aggressive, uncompromising "in your face" conservatism so many of the Republican rank-and-file have pined for in recent years. But the Trump phenomenon is another animal. It's wholly irrational. All this support for an erratic, unstable demagogue who  thinks that judges sign bills, says irresponsible and even ridiculous things with predictable regularity, and probably couldn't pass a test to become a U.S. citizen is explicable only if we see him as nothing more or less than an outlet for the evil in the human soul. I, for one, have no desire to share a party with the people who support him- who can support him. No matter what the electoral consequences, they are a cancer on the party the GOP  cannot live with. The trouble is that it's not at all clear that it can survive the operation to remove it.

And so the Supreme Court will be lost, possibly forever. Roe v. Wade, Obergefell v. Hodges, and a host of other logically indefensible examples of amendment of the U.S. Constitution by judicial fiat will be set in stone. The Constitution itself will be in mortal danger. Hillary Clinton will be president for at least four years, and it's not at all clear that there will be a coherent opposition to her either during that time or when the 2020 election rolls around.

The consequences of the Great Doofus Rebellion of 2016 were not so serious, the whole thing would be funny.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…