Skip to main content


I hope that Rachel Lu is right about the currently fashionable idiocy about gender identity and sexual orientation fading away. But I have my doubts.

We live in a society that has lost its mind. As statistics show the tragic consequences of treating a fundamental biological reality like gender as a social construct, politically motivated "scientists" will simply falsify the data. Judges will believe the falsified data. The media will present it as established truth. Our culture having lost its rootedness not only in religion but in logic and common sense, will not hear the call of nature summoning them back to reality. I can't see the crazy fading from our society. We've forgotten the way back.

It's worth remembering how homosexuality became "normal." The gay majority on the American Psychiatric Association board (one member being still in the closet at the time) voted themselves "normal." The vote was strictly, as it turned out, along the lines of personal sexual orientation.

There was an outcry from the rank-and-file.  Despite strong attempts at intimidation at the APA convention, the convention voted to submit the matter to a referendum. A gay advocacy group spent a large amount of money circulating a letter which appeared to be- but was not- from the APA board urging those who opposed the decision to abstain so as not to embarrass; the board.  The result wasn't exactly overwhelming, but enough members did abstain that the board's decision to declare homosexuality normal was sustained.

For years, surveys of the APA membership continued to show that large majorities still believed homosexuality to be pathological. But the official position of the APA said otherwise, and ultimately coercion did its work.

Flawed studies on the effects on children of being raised by same-sex couples were taken as gospel, while studies reaching the contrary conclusion were nit-picked into oblivion. At each stage, politics trumped science, and peer pressure was more powerful than sound methodology.  Peer review ceased to be a safeguard of the integrity of research as the analysis of researcher's peers became more and more influenced by political bias and groupthink. As in so much of the rest of the scientific community, the scientific method was subordinated to the requirements of politically correct dogma.

As time has gone on, the courts- themselves dominated by social activists and accepting the political positions of "the experts" as scientific fact- have driven the law farther and farther from nature and common sense. The media have effectively stigmatized and largely silenced voices raised in opposition,  labeling dissenters as bigots and using the weapons of mass culture to paint abnormal behaviors sympathetically and those with reservations about them as benighted monsters.

I don't see the process being reversed. We as a society are increasingly driven by emotions rather than reason. We have become more and more ignorant and less and less capable of critical thought. Perhaps Ms. Lu is right. Perhaps there is a limit beyond which nature and common sense will assert themselves so strongly that the walls of political orthodoxy and de facto censorship will collapse. But I don't see it happening. I think we are too far gone. I think that we have gone deaf to the voices of nature and reason.

Yes, truth is powerful. Yes, God is still in control. But perhaps, after generations of believing that the evils of the age betokened the end times, we're finally right in thinking that such might be the case today.

There is no promise that the Western culture won't come unraveled. We have no promise that reason and common sense will prevail in the end by any means short of Christ's return in judgment. But perhaps Ms. Lu is  right.

Or perhaps the ultimate solution is praying the ancient Syriac word with which St John concludes his Revelation: Maranatha.

"Come, O Lord!"

(Stefan Lochner's The Last Judgment is in the pubic domain in the United States and other countries in which the copyright term is the life of the artist plus 100 years or less.)


Pomeranus said…
Thank you, Robert. May God give us steadfastness and endurance until He indeed comes as He has promised.
Amen! Come, Lord Jesus!

Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…