Skip to main content

Trump, not Reagan, is the real Mr. Teflon

Democrats and their allies have perfected the art of the "attack ad." I remember two years ago, when now-Sen. Joni Ernst was running, how Iowans were treated to an ad showing a couple of corrupt capitalists chortling about how "Joni signed on the dotted line," supposedly pledging to protect tax breaks for companies that outsourced jobs overseas.

In fact, the pledge in question was merely a promise to fight all tax increases on anybody. The ad totally misrepresented its content. Fact checkers uniformly rated the charge "false," just has they had throughout the previous election cycle when Democrats and their allies tried to use the same pledge in the same way against Republicans all over the country.

It didn't work; Joni handily defeated Democratic Congressman Bruce Brailey. But the strategy is usually more successful. Four years ago, a series of misleading and in many cases near-slanderous attack ads on Mitt Romney define him in the public's eyes as a heartless plutocrat who valued money over people's lives. Frustratingly for many of us who supported him, Gov. Romney followed the conventional wisdom back then and ignored the ads rather than answering them on the theory that to do the latter would merely give the charges more publicity. It didn't work. Romney the Heartless was the image that stuck even though the ads were riddled with outright falsehoods. He was stuck with that image and lost the election in large part as a result.

Every boy who has ever played baseball knows about the fatal "blooper pitch-" a slow, arching, underhanded softball-like lob that looks like a beachball coming up to the plate, and is as virtually impossible to resist swinging at as it is to hit (the pros and even high school players have developed the discipline not to fall for it, knowing that it will probably end up outside the strike zone anyway). Well, Donald Trump is something of a "blooper pitch." The guy is so outrageous, so off-the-wall, so out of control, so absolutely horrific that there's nothing you can say about him that isn't already obvious to anybody who's paying attention!

Trump's supporters have long since shown themselves immune to facts or reason. Confronted with an unpleasant truth about The Donald, they simply and willfully refuse to believe it no matter what the evidence. And as David Catanese writes, audience-testing of attack ads on Trump seems to show that they're not going to work because exposure to his outrageous antics has immunized voters to the effects of having them pointed out!

There is, it seems, an advantage to running a notorious clown for president. No matter what anybody says about him, it's no surprise to anybody. As Catanese points out, Trump has already defined himself so clearly in the public's mind that nothing the Democrats can do is going to change much. And Trump's cult-like supporters have long since lost contact with reality where he is concerned in any case; while everyone else is immunized by reality, they are protected from it by their own willful decision to ignore any evidence that contradicts their conviction that Trump is a kind of American messiah.

No, on reflection, I don't think that's quite it. In "Game of Thrones," one of my favorite characters, Tyrion Lannister- dwarf, political genius and one of the most likable characters in the series- says at one point that once a person accepts his weaknesses, his enemies can no longer use them against him. And there's a great deal of truth in that.

To use another pop-culture parallel, in the movie "The Untouchables" Chicago cop Sean Connery accepts Kevin Costner's statement that he's a member of the Federal unit that has made public fools of themselves by making several early and ill-advised moves because "Who would claim to be that, who was not?"

If you're Donald Trump, there's not much people can say about you that will make you look more like an irresponsible, utterly unqualified and rather nutty doofus than that very fact. So what harm can attack ads do you by simply affirming that you are, indeed Donald Trump?

Catanese's article scares me a little. We already know that Donald Trump is Donald Trump, so pointing that fact out won't change anybody's mind. It makes sense that those attack ads shouldn't work. Those who are for Trump will be for him even if, as he himself remarked, he were to commit murder in broad daylight on New York's Fifth Avenue. Those who are not already know everything they need to know about him. The Donald is a modern wonder: a candidate who is immune to attack.

Now, I still think he's going to lose decisively. I think that, first, because the second group is easily the majority, and as time goes on the implications of electing the man they know Donald Trump to be are going to become clearer and more real. But more than that, what worked in a series of primary elections and caucuses involving to a great extent voters who were voting out of anger and were politically rather far out in right field to begin with isn't going to work in with a general election electorate who are more centrist and angry about different things.

But Catanese has hit on one of the most frustrating things about Donald Trump: nothing you can say about him, however bad and however truthful, is going to have any effect on anybody.

They either will refuse to believe you no matter what the evidence or they already know.

HT: Real Clear Politics

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…