Skip to main content

What is Trump wasting his cash on?

Donald Trump had $20 million dollars in his campaign fund at the end of June. He raised $80 million in July and had $37 million on hand in August.

So he spent $63 million in July, right? But on what?

He hasn't spent it on TV or advertising. Seen any Trump ads recently? Just Clinton ads, right?

He hasn't spent it on staff, or field offices, or on those get-out-the-vote efforts he holds in such contempt. We keep hearing about all the officers he's "about" to open in swing states. But they're not opening.

To the extent this election is going to be competitive at all, the key states Trump must win are Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida. In Ohio, he has one office and four paid staffers; Clinton has twelve, and about 250 paid staff .

In Pennsylvania, Trump has five offices.  Clinton has more than twenty and about 200 paid staff.

In Florida, Trump has one office and one paid staff. He supposedly is going to suddenly open 25 in September. But Hillary already has 12 campaign offices and hundreds of volunteers already conducting the canvass operation any professional campaign would have well underway by this point.

The thing is, it's getting late in the game for getting the "ground game," so to speak, "off the ground." And there is little evidence that the Trump people are doing much about it. Now, Trump has been quite vocal about his contempt for such things. He maintains that it's the strength of a candidate's personality, and not organization and hard work, that win presidential elections. He's not simply wrong about this. He's so drastically wrong that it simply proves that in this, as in so much else, he has absolutely no idea what he's talking about. We already know that he's a narcissist. But the depth of his hubris appears to be abysmal.

But where did that $63 million go? "The Huffington Post" has an article by Bob Burnett that lays all of this out, and runs through various possible answers- and the reason why none of them really work.

It also points out the most likely explanation for the mystery: Donald Trump is simply not a very good manager, He not only knows nothing about running a presidential campaign but hasn't surrounded himself with people who do.

I am not cynical enough to think that even Trump has lined his own pockets with this money. It was probably spent somewhere, for things that don't even matter. The significance of the missing $63 million is two-fold.

First, it shows what his record already makes clear to anyone who actually examines it rather than taking him at his word: Donald Trump not only isn't a good manager himself but doesn't seem to be able to delegate responsibility to those who are. Imagine what would happen if it were the country he was running, and  the cabinet and various executive departments he wasn't staffing with competent people. Even authoritarian candidates who boast that they can make the trains run on time (which, btw, they actually didn't in Mussolini's Italy) has to, well, make the trains run on time at least on occasion. What possible use is authoritarianism if it isn't at least efficient?

The second point is that Trump's lack of and apparent contempt for organization is going to cost him dearly in November. You don't get credit for voters who support you but never get around to voting on Election Day. This point can easily be overdone- I ran a ward canvass operation for George McGovern in Chicago in 1972, and I can tell you all the organization and hard work in the world won't help if you have a non-viable candidate. But if an election is at all close, what matters is not how many voters support candidate "A" as opposed to candidate "B,"but rather how many voters who support each of them actually get to the polls!

Trump's incompetence as a campaign manager as well as his incompetence as a candidate not only reinforce pre-existing doubts about his competence as a potential president but also illustrate why he'll never be president. He's going to lose massively in any case. And he's not even a good enough manager to see the importance of getting his supporters to actually vote for him!

Where is the money? I have no idea- and for the most part, it doesn't really matter. Labor Day is the traditional start of the campaign, and maybe- as Burnett points out- he's got a massive TV ad program ready.

But he doesn't seem to be buying ad time.

Maybe he's going to be opening a whole slew of offices, especially in those three critical states. But who is going to staff them? He has a great deal of recruiting to do when it comes to volunteers, and certainly his followers- say whatever else you want about them- are enthusiastic.  But he should have hundreds and hundreds of them signed up by now.

Maybe he's got some kind of surprise planned. But what could it be?  And can it offset the time he's already lost?

Maybe. But until I see evidence to the contrary, I think the most likely explanation is still that Donald Trump doesn't know any more about running a campaign than he does about running a country- and that he's going to be slaughtered in November.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…