Skip to main content

Hoping for the best from an unfit president-elect is one thing. Expecting it is another.

Now that Donald Trump has been elected. it's human nature to try to make lemonade out of the biggest lemon America has bought in my lifetime. Even solid Never Trump people in some circles are trying to convince themselves that maybe they've been wrong.

Well, we were wrong about several things. The main one is that the historical common sense of the American people was a dependable anti-Trump firewall. We depended on it in the primaries and again in the general election. It proved illusory. Our national IQ has been trending downward for decards. Mores have become ever more socially and personally self-destructive. Ignorance about the world, about history, about religion, and about most other things has skyrocketed. The evidence was overwhelming even before Tuesday that our fabled national common sense was a thing of the past. I and many others were shocked by the election of a catastrophically unqualified and unprepared emotionally immature narcissist and psychopath. In retrospect, we shouldn't have been.

I've laughed at Trump supporters ever since the guy who represented Trump at our precinct caucus last winter made the bizarre claim that Trump- whom the polls even then showed to be the only Republican who could not beat Hillary Clinton- was the only Republican who could. The claim is still crazy; had the candidate been anyone else, I'm convinced even now that the result on Tuesday would have been a landslide. But it was I, and not the Trumpsters, who was deceived about the possibility of Trump being elected, an eventuality they insisted was inevitable all the time, while I and other centrists scoffed that they were crazy for thinking it was even possible.

We, as it turned out, were the delusional ones. The polls were wrong- and probably consistently wrong. The biggest problem probably was that they were weighted badly and failed to consider people who hadn't voted before but were attracted to the process by Trump. Non-college-educated rural whites were obviously underrepresented in the formulas that were used.

In most ways, this was a one-off election. Even in the highly unlikely event that Trump succeeds as president, he will fail his supporters. Even  a psychopath cannot govern as the idiot Donald Trump ran as. He is going to have to at least pretend to be a civilized human being. The demagoguery probably won't go away, but it will become more subtle. The wall and other impractical ideas will, of course, never be followed through upon. Reality will hit Donald Trump like a sledgehammer on January 20. He will be so far out of his depth that he will need a bathysphere, and in some ways, even Trump will be unable to help being humbled by the experience.

There are some who hope that Trump- who is unbelievably ignorant about the American Constitution and government and about the world he pontificates about-will surround himself with people who actually know what they're doing, will take their advice, and will end up governing as something resembling a responsible human being. I hope so, too. There is historical precedent for such things; not every president has been up to the job, and some have managed to avoid disaster simply by taking the advice of people who knew what they did not. But that would require a degree of humility I'm not sure The Donald can summon.

I hope Donald Trump continues to prove me wrong. I hope he continues to demonstrate that it is I, and not his supporters, who is delusional. But like the National Review in its current edition, I fear otherwise. Donald Trump's flaws cannot be ignored away, as the exit polls show that a huge proportion of those who recognized his unfitness for the presidency did last Tuesday. They are all too real, and they are fundamental realities we're all going to have to live with for the next four years.

A fascinating statistic: pollsters discovered on Election Day was that of the voters realistic enough to acknowledge that neither of the major party candidates was fit to be president,  twice as many voted for Trump as for Clinton. This dovetails with my own observation that many voters who were well aware of Trump's fundamental personality flaws and disliked the prospect of voting for him managed to rationalize catastrophic pathologies into mere quirks because they were so aware of the consequences of electing Hillary that they never thought through the consequences of electing Trump- or more often, refused to allow themselves to recognize just how catastrophic they were.

I think we as a nation understood that we were electing a time-bomb on Tuesday. But I don't think we realized that it was on a hair trigger and that its explosive force can be measured in megatons.

Oh. And yes, the author of the NR article- Ben Shapiro- is the guy pro-Trump websites portrayed as an inmate of "Camp Trump" wearing a Holocaust-era concentration camp uniform, and as the inhabitant of a gas chamber being operated by a smirking Donald Trump dressed in a Nazi soldier.

One would have hoped that the supporters he attracted would at least have served as more of a warning than it apparently did that Donald Trump was not simply flawed, but catastrophically flawed.


Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…