Skip to main content

A motto for President Trump's foreign policy

When President Obama took office, members of his administration let leak a motto he had adopted for the conduct of his foreign policy: "Don't do stupid s--t." The result was a passive approach to the world which resulted in the United States being viewed with contempt by allies and enemies alike.

But it seems as if President Trump's foreign policy will make Mr. Obama look like Genghis Khan. He seems to be actually afraid of the world. When he announced a new immigration policy yesterday that will treat our friends in the Muslim world exactly like our enemies and trap persecuted human beings in the grip of their persecutors, a wail of consternation understandably arose. Mr. Trump's response?   "The world is still a mess. The world is as angry as it gets. What, you think this is going to cause a little more anger? The world is an angry place." And it is that. The problem is that his foreign policy promises to make if far angrier and far messier. It's not so much insulating us from the fire as pouring gasoline on it.

One does not solve problems by refusing to deal with them.

At least President Trump isn't barring all Muslims from immigrating, as he proposed during the campaign. Instead, he's severely curtailing immigration from Muslim-majority countries- and not just those in which ISIS and al Quaeda are active. A theme seems to be emerging in Mr. Trump's view of the world, a theme obvious in his otherwise disjointed and often incoherent campaign statements about foreign policy and his evocation of the discredited motto of the isolationists of the Hitler era, "America First.".

As David Brooks writes in The New York TimesMr. Trump's foreign policy is essentially a foreign policy of fear, and even cowardice. Americans once met the world with confidence and dealt with it with strength. But no more, it seems. America since World War II has filled a role which historically somebody has always had to fill in order to prevent the world descending into chaos; the leader of the international order, the biggest kid on the block who could provide direction, leadership and sometimes muscle to keep the bad guys from running amok and plunging the globe into chaos. For a long time, the British played that role. But when Clement Atlee- in many ways the Donald Trump of English history- decided that appeasement was the way to deal with Hitler and let the bad guys have their way, the world descended into the most destructive war in its history.

No, actually that's not fair- to Atlee. Atlee was more the Obama of English history than the Trump. He remained engaged with the world. He simply wimped out on the role it depended on England to play. Trump goes far beyond that. He has revived the illusion which paralyzed America during the period leading up to World War II, the illusion that our separation by two oceans from the rest of the world provides us with the opportunity to remain aloof from it.

That proved to be delusional in the 1940's, and it's even more so today. The world is economically interdependent to an extent that Mr. Trump, for all his vaunted business acumen, seems not to understand. Former Mexican president Vincente Fox summed up the obvious and inevitable response of his country to the abusive treatment of the Trump administration quite matter-of-factly: "We have China to trade with." Even Fox News, which has become the electronic Pravda or Volkischer Beobacher of the Trump regime, acknowledges that Mr. Trump's withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement opens the door to China- carefully excluded from the deal by the Obama administration- not only to step in and take over our role in Asia's economy but to extend its influence throughout the Pacific region. The withdrawal of the United States from the TTP seems to be the first step in the termination of America's role as a Pacific power. Mr. Trump's actual approval of Russia's aggression in the Crimea raises questions as to what, if anything, he is prepared to do when Russia tries to re-take the Baltic nations. And our friends in Asia must now begin to wonder whether they are in any better shape.

President Fox's statement foreshadows the future. When the United States ceases to be a reliable trading partner and ally, smaller nations will seek others. The Trump administration's policy of withdrawal from the world will ultimately end up simply marginalizing the United States, weakening its economic and political influence and ironically demoting America from its preeminent place in the world to that of an also-ran. It will make China first, not America.

Cowardice is not a position of strength. Incoherent and erratic egotism is not an adequate foreign policy. And Donald Trump's apparent determination to run away from the challenges of involvement with the world will only make America a weaker, poorer and progressively more vulnerable a nation.


Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…