Skip to main content

President Trump is already making history!

Here he is, only three days into his presidency, and NEOTUS* has already accomplished something unique and historic.

Consider the net positive Gallup popularity ratings of the past 13 incoming presidents.

Harry Truman entered office with an 87% approval rating, with three percent disapproving- a net approval rating of +84%.

Ike became president with a 68% approval rating, with seven percent disapproving- a net +61% positive rating.

Jack Kennedy took the oath with a 72% approval rating. Six percent disapproved. That gave him a net +66% rating.

Lyndon Johnson had a 78% approval rating when he became president, with only two percent disapproving. That's a net +76% rating.

Richard Nixon had a 59% approval rating and a five percent disapproval rating when he became president. Net rating: +54%.

Gerald Ford had a 71% approval rating when Nixon resigned. Three percent disapproved. Ford had a net popularity of +68%.

Jimmy Carter took office with 66% approving and eight percent disapproving, a net rating of +58%.

Ronald Reagan had a 55% approval rating four years later, with 18% disapproving, for a +37% positive rating.

George H.W. Bush had only a 51% positive rating, but only six percent disapproved, leaving him with a +54% rating.

Bill Clinton took office with 58% approving and a relatively large 20% disapproving. However, that was still good for a net +38% rating.

George W. Bush had a 55% positive rating and a 25% negative rating after the contentious 2000 election. That still left him with a +32% rating.

Barack Obama, our first African-American president, took office with a 68% positive rating and a 12% negative rating, for a net popularity of +56%.

Since 1945, the average president has entered office with a 66% approval rating and a ten percent negative rating, with a differential of +56%.

Donald Trump has taken office with a 45% positive rating and a 45% negative rating, for a net popularity of zero.

George W. Bush was a divisive president I supported. Barack Obama was a divisive president I did not support. Richard Nixon was divisive. Ronald Reagan was divisive. Lyndon Johnson was divisive. Jimmy Carter was divisive. Hillary Clinton, Mr. Trump's defeated opponent, was about as divisive as they come. But when it comes to divisiveness, Donald John Trump is in a class by himself among modern presidents.

When it comes to divisiveness,  The Donald is Abraham Lincoln without the Abraham Lincoln-ness.

Now, about that "mandate" Mr. Trump has because of his "landslide" victory he won while losing the popular vote, Trump fans...

*NEOTUS: National Embarrassment Of The United States


Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

Reflections on the present and future of my Blackhawks

As this season from hell creeps to its close at an excruciating pace and makes all of us devote more of our attention to spring training for the Cubs than we otherwise might, there are calls for the heads of Blackhawks GM Stan Bowman and even the greatest coach in Blackhawks history, Joel Quenneville.

No general manager or coach could have made Marian Hossa and Corey Crawford healthy or prevented Toews and Keith and Saad from having the worst seasons of their careers or foreseen that a series of trades most of which made perfect sense at the time wouldn't pan out. The Hawks are one season removed from the second-best regular season in their history. This will be the first time in a decade that they haven't made the playoffs.

With the exception of the Pens, maybe the Kings and (for different reasons) the Golden Knights, every other team in the NHL would kill to have won three Stanley Cups in the past decade. In fact, only the Hawks, the Pens, the Kings, the Wings, and the Brui…