Skip to main content

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first landed on the moon to fall behind the other developed nations in an area which will represent a significant element in humanity's scientific and economic future.

Finally- and in some ways, most importantly- there's the economic impact of a renewed manned effort in space. It's not just that it would be better to have the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft ferrying American astronauts to the International Space Station than continuing to have them hitch a ride with the Russians. It seems incredible that nobody has noticed the incredible impact the Mercury, Gemini. and Apollo programs had on the American economy. Despite Luddite arguments about the need to be spending our tax revenues on more pressing needs existing on Earth, every dollar spent on the manned space program returned exponentially more revenue not only to the American economy but to the American government! It would be interesting for the bean counters to sit down and figure out exactly how much of how many Great Society programs were bankrolled by the manned space program and the tax revenues it generated from the whole industries it called into being!

And entire industries did spring into existence because of John Kennedy's decision to go to the moon. They sprang into being not in response to Kennedy's command, but rather at the call of the greatest economic stimulus of all- actual demand- to fill actual and objective needs which otherwise would not have existed, These, in turn, created needs which caused still other industries to come into being to fill them, employing huge numbers of people and pumping life especially into the economies of several Western states- economies and industries which have dried up like unwatered houseplants since the manned space program was curtailed and then abandoned. I cannot understand how any administration seriously committed to getting our chronically sluggish economy growing again and putting large numbers of American workers back can fail to see that a return to the moon and thereafter a decision to go to Mars would be the best decisions the government could make. If there are needs at home (or, for that matter, a deficit to reduce), wouldn't it be a good idea to multiply the available amount of money for addressing them by utilizing a tried-and-true strategy for putting the economy on steroids?

And best of all, it will be private industry (doubtless with government investment and even subsidies, but private industry nonetheless) that will bear the primary cost. The impact that will have on the space program can be seen in the image at the upper left of this post. For most of the space age, every mission has made use of a new, disposable booster that fell useless into the sea once its function was served. A large step toward dealing with the waste this entailed was taken when the space shuttle program made the fuel tank and main booster section reusable, although disposable auxiliary engines on each side of the tank were still employed. The SpaceX Falcon 9, pictured above, will be the world's first entirely reusable booster. The constraints posed by the profit motive are apt to make an already profitable venture run by the government into a far more profitable venture run by people actually trying to make a profit!

Whole industries stand to be revived, the economy rejuvenated, and the government enriched by the increased tax revenue this decision will make possible while private industry bears the brunt of the cost. And the United States will take its head out of the sand and once again focus, along with the other great nations of the Earth, on its destiny among the stars. As critical as I am of 45, he has once again done exactly the right thing in an area which will profoundly affect America's future for the better.

Please, Mr. President. Keep surprising me!


Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…