Skip to main content

Sorry, but the Gorsuch confirmation does NOT tilt SCOTUS to the Right!

Reuters article: "Trump's pick Gorsuch sworn in, restoring top court's conservative tilt."

Excuse me? On what planet has the United States Supreme Court ever in recent history had a "conservative tilt?"

I'm used to hearing that bizarre assertion from the Left, who somehow have the idea that Anthony Kennedy, sometimes described as the "swing vote" on the Court, is a conservative. He is indeed often a "swing vote,"  and has been known to often vote on the conservative side on First and Second Amendment issues. He dissented from the Court's ruling on the constitutionality of Obamacare and provided the decisive vote in striking down the District of Columbia's restrictive gun law.

But the author of the majority opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges is very far from being a predictable conservativeNo reasonable person would describe Anthony Kennedy as an originalist, or a "strict constructionist," If the Court has a Center, Kennedy occupies it.

Thomas is a conservative. Alito is a conservative. Even Roberts is a conservative. The late, great Antonin Scalia was a conservative. And yes, Gorsuch is a conservative. But while  Anthony Kennedy can accurately be described as the Court's ideological fulcrum, it's just as misleading to call him a conservative as it would be to call him a liberal. The appointment of Gorsuch does not in any sense "tilt" the Court to the Right. It simply undoes a temporary advantage for the Left, in which four liberal justices and three conservative ones served with a justice who on any given case could side with either camp.

It certainly is possible that Donald Trump will appoint up to three more justices in the next four years. Justice Kennedy, along with Justices Ginsberg and Breyer, are all of an age at which that possibility naturally arises. Before Mr. Trump's term is over the Court may well have a "conservative tilt," and perhaps even a decisive one. But as of now, the Court is evenly balanced between four liberal justices and four conservative ones, with one- Justice Kennedy- who on any given issue might well go either way.


Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…