Skip to main content

Ex-Mossad head Shavit: 'If tomorrow I were asked to pass information to the CIA, I would do everything I could to not pass it to them’

President Trump says that he wants to be "tough" on ISIS. No reasonable person could complain about that. The swift, decisive, measured and appropriate response he made to the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government is an example of one way this can be done, even if ISIS wasn't the target.

But ISIS doesn't generally operate against us directly. It operates against our allies, in areas of the world in which (whether or not the current administration acknowledges it) we have vital interests. Even leaving out the desirability of not putting "boots on the ground" in places and in numbers where it isn't required to defend out interests, those fighting ISIS on our behalf are usually not Americans at all. They're the military and intelligence services of our allies. Evan McMullin spent his career identifying and locating ISIS and al Quaeda leaders and facilitating their deaths. Many Americans inside and outside our clandestine services carry on that work today. But the major part of the burden will always be borne by our local allies, and even when we act directly, more often than not it's on the basis of information provided by those allies and their intelligence services.

Such was the case with the information about the ISIS plot to compromise aircraft security which Mossad obtained and shared with the United States, and President Trump recklessly blurted out in conversation with the Russian ambassador and foreign minister. We know that he gave them information about a city which could be enough to compromise the asset. A Mossad agent- or more than one Mossad agent- might die because the president wanted to brag. It may already have happened.

Beyond that, there is simply no way to overestimate the value of information developed by friendly intelligence operations, especially in the Middle East. When our president carelessly "burns" an Israeli asset, he undermines the confidence not only of Israel but of all of our allies in the degree to which the United States can be trusted with the information they share with us. We know that American intelligence officials, aware of President Trump's impulsiveness and lack of filters as well as the danger that key members of his administration might be compromised by their contacts with Russia, warned Israel last January to be careful about sharing sensitive information with an administration which could not necessarily be trusted with it. President Trump's blunder has vindicated that advice.

The Israeli foreign ministry says that it looks forward to continuing to work together with this administration against the common enemies of our two countries. But diplomatic niceties aside, Israel and Mossad, in particular, are as mad as hell, and rightly so.  Our man-child of a president has jeopardized out intelligence relationship with our most important ally in the region just so he could brag about something unimportant.

Here's a useful article by Daniel Byman on the crucial role foreign intelligence services play in our fight against ISIS, al Quaeda, and other terrorist groups.  It should demonstrate beyond any doubt why questions of whether President Trump broke any laws by sharing the information (including information which compromised the source) with the enemies of both Israel and the United States are beside the point.  The president hurt Israel when he decided that his need to brag was more urgent than the security of the source and safety of the Mossad agent or agents in question. He undermined a vital relationship we depend on to keep ourselves safe as well.


Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…