Skip to main content

High government officials are not 'apprentices!'

Within the past couple of days, President Trump has contradicted White House spokesmen Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Sean Spicer about the reasons for the Comey firing and National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster about his blurting out of sensitive classified information to Russian diplomats on May 10. He also embarrassed Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, whom he ordered to put together a report on James Comey's conduct and then told reporters that he had been going to fire Comey no matter what the report said.

Trump's imperious way of treating "the help" may be a carryover from the private sector. But in government- and especially in an administration that seems to be having a remarkably tough time staffing itself- you just can't do that sort of thing. Qualified potential government officials are not so thick on the ground that you can disregard their feelings and publicly humiliate them with abandon. Doubtless, the president's personal arrogance plays a role here. Doubtless, too, to some extent, it's simply another manifestation of his habit of running off at the mouth and thinking about the consequences later, if at all.

John Hudak of The Brookings Institution asks a serious question: in light of his track record of belittling and embarrassing his subordinates, is the president going to be able to fill all those vacant positions in his administration with top-notch people? And how in the world is he going to keep the ones he has if he continues to send the message through his behavior that he doesn't value them?

This president places a premium on loyalty, even inappropriately asking former Director Comey of a personal pledge of loyalty when the director's duties required him to maintain a certain amount of independence from direct White House control. But he seems to forget that loyalty is a commodity which works both ways. If he doesn't give it, he may find it increasingly difficult to get.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…