Skip to main content

Kushner reportedly tried to set up a secret, illegal Trump-Putin channel BEFORE the inauguration

It's not just Michael Flynn. Not by a long shot.

According to a story run in this morning's Washington PostIvanka's husband, Jared Kushner, tried to set up a secret, secure, back-channel line of communications between the Trump transition team and the Kremlin. The proposal- which in the eyes of the FBI and the CIA amounts to treason- was so inappropriate that Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak was "taken aback."

At the very least, it's a violation of the Logan Act, which prohibits private citizens from negotiating with foreign powers. But it's even more serious than that. Glenn Carle, the former head of counterterrorism operations for the CIA, says bluntly, "If you are in a position of public trust, and you talk to, meet, or collude with a foreign power" through other than official channels, "you are, in the eyes of the FBI and CIA, a traitor."

The story confirms a report by Reuters earlier in the month about attempts by the Trump campaign to establish a backchannel means of communication between then President-elect Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Reuters reported at least 18 contacts between Trump campaign officials and the Russians over the last seven months of last year's campaign.

The report adds motive to the appearance of an attempt to obstruct justice on the president's part by supposedly asking former FBI Director James Comey to drop the investigation into Flynn, an appearance intensified by efforts by Trump aides to either keep meetings with the Russians secret from the appropriate American authorities or even to mislead them.

Carle points out that the Post learned of the Kushner meeting via an anonymous letter. He raised the possibility that the Russians might have sent it in an attempt to direct attention away from other and more incriminating meetings with the Russians. In any event, such a pattern of improper and clandestine meetings between Trump transition officials and the Russian government raises disturbing questions about why the Trump people were so anxious to be able to communicate with Putin and the Russians without American counterintelligence agencies being aware of it.

Former CIA officer, former independent presidential candidate, and current Trump critic Evan McMullin tweeted, "If true, this is treasonous activity, whether  borne of malice or naivete, or both."

He added, "In the intelligence business, this is known as a 'comms plan.' Usually, however, it's proposed by the officer, not by the traitor."

In any case "treason" at this point is an accurate description only as the word is apparently used in the intelligence services. The legal definition of the term is given by Article 3, Section 3 of the United States Constitution, which says, "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."

Whether or not the definition fits, that hasn't happened yet, either in Flynn's case nor Kushner's nor in the case of any other Trump campaign or transition official. The truly significant thing about today's revelations is the seriousness it adds to former Director Comey's claim that President Trump tried to get him to drop the investigation into Gen. Flynn's activities with regard to the Russians.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…