Skip to main content

No two ways about it: This absolutely IS an impeachable offense!

It's not just that Donald Trump came to the presidency knowing essentially nothing about government, foreign policy, or even the Constitution. It's not just that he's a full-blown conspiracy theorist whose contact with reality is at best tenuous. It's  not just that he's psychologically immature and even displays symptoms of serious psychological problems. It's not just that his judgment is questionable. It's not just that he's grandiose, erratic, and impulsive. It's not just that the core of his support comes from the craziest, ugliest, most extreme, and most un-American corners of the political spectrum. It's not even that his entire adult life has been an exercise in ignoring ethics and playing fast and loose with the law.

The man has no filters.

I've been predicting since the night he was elected (an event I never in a million years imagined would ever occur, having some degree of faith in the ability of the American people to, you know, notice the glaringly obvious things above) that he would resign or be impeached before he could finish his first term. Tonight, that seems more likely than ever.

The Washington Post has run a story, which Reuters has confirmed,  that in the course of bragging to the Russian foreign minister and ambassador last week about how great his intelligence briefings were he revealed information so highly classified that it hasn't even been shared with our allies and which endangers our intelligence sources and capabilities and those of our friends.   Even more seriously, the information he revealed is particularly dangerous in the hands of the Russians!



Denials by administration officials, including National Security Advisor Gen. H.R. McMaster,  were carefully worded to avoid the issue.  At no point did they deny that a serious breach of secrecy had occurred. The Post's reporter who covered Gen. McMaster's press conference accused him of playing "word games," and wondered why administration officials placed hurried telephone calls to the CIA and the NSA to contain the damage and asked the Post to agree (which it did) not to reveal details of what the president said to the Russian diplomats on the ground that to do so would "jeopardize important intelligence capabilities" if the information didn't do precisely that when the president handed it to the Russians on a verbal silver platter!

Donald Trump's radical unfitness for the presidency has been glaringly obvious to anyone who didn't let partisanship obliterate his or her good judgment and who was simply paying attention since long before the day he announced his candidacy. I predict that the Republicans in Congress and partisan Republicans, in general, will remain in denial about that fact. But I continue to predict his resignation or impeachment before the 2020 election. A man whose verbal and ethical filters are both as lacking as Donald Trump's simply cannot help but shrivel in the brightest spotlight of all.

For the present, as the Brookings Institution article points out, the president broke no law and did nothing he was not legally entitled to do. But that does not make this any less serious a matter. It absolutely seems to be a violation of his oath of office and by precedent an impeachable offense, whether the partisan Republicans in Congress see fit to recognize it or not. It compromises the confidence of our allies- already rather shaky- in their ability to share intelligence information with the United States in confidence that it won't end up in Russian hands.

And as the Brookings article also points out,

Trump's alleged screw-up reveals yet again what we have learned many times in the last four months: The successful operation of our government assumes a minimally competent Chief Executive that we now lack.

It goes on to point out that literally, any other employee of the Executive Branch would have been fired for what Mr. Trump seems to have done in the Oval Office last week.

And the article in the Post sums it all up:

"It is all kind of shocking, said a former senior U.S. official who is close to current administration officials. "Trump seems to be very reckless and doesn't grasp the gravity of the things he's dealing with, especially when it comes to intelligence and national security."

Which has been as clear as can be to anybody who has ever bothered to pay attention to Donald Trump's personality and character, and has been throughout his entire adult life.

Graphic by DonkeyHotey

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

Reflections on the present and future of my Blackhawks

As this season from hell creeps to its close at an excruciating pace and makes all of us devote more of our attention to spring training for the Cubs than we otherwise might, there are calls for the heads of Blackhawks GM Stan Bowman and even the greatest coach in Blackhawks history, Joel Quenneville.

No general manager or coach could have made Marian Hossa and Corey Crawford healthy or prevented Toews and Keith and Saad from having the worst seasons of their careers or foreseen that a series of trades most of which made perfect sense at the time wouldn't pan out. The Hawks are one season removed from the second-best regular season in their history. This will be the first time in a decade that they haven't made the playoffs.

With the exception of the Pens, maybe the Kings and (for different reasons) the Golden Knights, every other team in the NHL would kill to have won three Stanley Cups in the past decade. In fact, only the Hawks, the Pens, the Kings, the Wings, and the Brui…