Skip to main content


That's the term E.J. Dionne of the Washington Post has coined for people like me- people who are disgusted by how the noble title of "conservative" has degenerated into a synonym for mean-spirited, conspiracy-minded lunacy.

As Dionne observes, there aren't many politicians among us. Ben Sasse comes to mind. I guess you would have to consider Evan McMullin a politician now, too, since he ran for president last year as an independent and seems likely to do the same in a bid for Orrin Hatch's Senate seat next year. But for the most part, we're academics, writers, and just plain ordinary people who find ourselves unable to stomach what the Republican party has become. Some, like Sasse, choose to remain within that party and fight for what's left of its soul. Others, like McMullin (and myself), are so disillusioned with the gutlessness of a Republican party which has sold out so completely to Trumpist protectionism, isolationism, scapegoating nativism. and authoritarianism that we have severed our ties to a party Lincoln and Eisenhower and Reagan would no longer recognize.

Dionne points out that the phenomenon has a rough precedent in the behavior of people like Daniel Patrick Moynihan and Irving Kristol, whose unease with some of the more excessive features of FDR's program caused them to  evolve from New Deal liberals into what eventually became known as "neoconservatives." It has become fashionable in some circles to misuse that term to mean adherents of an aggressively Bush-like militaristic internationalism. In fact, its true meaning has always been as a description of pragmatists best described, as Kristol himself described them, as "liberals who have been mugged by reality."

Some, like Moynihan, stayed within the Democratic party; others, like Kristol and Norman Podhoretz, became Republicans.  Something similar, Dionne suggests, is happening to the movement represented by McMullin and Sasse. And by people like me.

But the trajectory of the "neo-moderate" movement will move in a different direction. The Democratic party is, after all, just as crazy Left as the Republican party is crazy Right (or wherever Donald Trump's inconsistent hodge-podge might fit on the political spectrum). "Neo-Mods," by and large, would find the Democratic party as inhospitable as the Republican- though it should be noted, as McMullin hinted in the tweet to which Dionne refers in the article, some members of the movement are already part of the small but very real moderate wing of the Democratic party and may remain there. I personally see the two-party system as having failed so cataclysmically that a new, centrist third party is needed, and needed desperately. Perhaps that's the route the "neo-mod" movement will take.

Or perhaps it will remain independent of party politics, embrace members of both parties, and neither. At least for the short run, that seems to be the route the Centrist Project has taken as it seeks to elect independents to public office who can wield the balance of power in the Senate and perhaps the House and thus exercise an influence out of all proportion to their numbers in Congress. Or perhaps it might end up looking more like McMullin's Stand Up Republic, a movement which grew out of McMullin's independent conservative presidential candidacy last year but has come to embrace moderate liberals as well as conservatives.

But whatever direction it takes, I agree with Dionne that it would be a mistake to dismiss it. Like our predecessor movement, we are a reaction to a hole on the American political spectrum that needs to be filled. If anything, the extremism and superficial, mindless partisanship of both of the two major parties makes it even more necessary that the sensible middle find a way to introduce some common sense into a dysfunctional system which seems unable to do anything about the problems facing the nation other than to provide two respective echo chambers from which extremists of the Right and the Left can blame each other for all of them while themselves disavowing all responsibility, and displaying none.


Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

Reflections on the present and future of my Blackhawks

As this season from hell creeps to its close at an excruciating pace and makes all of us devote more of our attention to spring training for the Cubs than we otherwise might, there are calls for the heads of Blackhawks GM Stan Bowman and even the greatest coach in Blackhawks history, Joel Quenneville.

No general manager or coach could have made Marian Hossa and Corey Crawford healthy or prevented Toews and Keith and Saad from having the worst seasons of their careers or foreseen that a series of trades most of which made perfect sense at the time wouldn't pan out. The Hawks are one season removed from the second-best regular season in their history. This will be the first time in a decade that they haven't made the playoffs.

With the exception of the Pens, maybe the Kings and (for different reasons) the Golden Knights, every other team in the NHL would kill to have won three Stanley Cups in the past decade. In fact, only the Hawks, the Pens, the Kings, the Wings, and the Brui…