Skip to main content

Satire doesn't have to be an exaggeration to be satire

Ok. So this test is satirical.

I think.

But that doesn't change the scary fact that a considerable percentage of President Trump's base would probably get the answers to all seven of the questions "right!" And that conveys quite well why I am so alarmed at the phenomenon of Donald Trump.

He really could, as he once boasted, commit cold-blooded murder on New York's Fifth Avenue in broad daylight and not lose the support of his base.  It's not just that I think the guy is a dangerously ignorant and impulsive and dishonest bully and demagogue who is utterly unqualified for the office he holds. It's that he holds it because of people who could literally pass the test linked to above.

Anybody who has read this blog long enough may remember that in the early days of the Obama administration I mocked the cult of personality that had developed around the man. He was no kind of messiah, no matter what his adoring followers inside and outside the mainstream media might have said about him. Most Republicans at the time agreed and were appalled at the virtual worship accorded the guy. But oddly, very few of them reflect on the fact that it never even approached the kind of mindless and absolutely uncritical adulation his successor is receiving. Yeah, I understand that in a society as polarized as ours both support for and opposition to our leaders tend to be extreme. But the cult of personality which was unhealthy when it surrounded Barack Obama is every bit as unhealthy- if not more so- when it surrounds a man who lacks Mr. Obama's intellect, emotional maturity, stability, and even his highly-deficient respect for the Constitution and the democratic process. Nor did Barack Obama habitually threaten his opponents or suggest that they ought to be silenced.

Every moment that Donald Trump remains president demeans the office and the nation. I pray that the nation recovers from the experience of having him as our leader; the dignity of the office never will. There are enough grownups around Mr. Trump to restrain Steve Bannon- physically, if necessary- and prevent the President from nuking Monaco on a whim. No, it's his followers who really scare me, and even more the fact that the "he wasn't my first choice but he's better than Hillary would have been" crowd seems to be resembling the people who would pass this test with flying colors more and more as time goes on. I think most Republicans would still get a couple of the answers "wrong." But you would think that there are so many in their ranks because of  Mr. Trump who would get a perfect score might trouble them a bit.

The fact that it doesn't only illustrates how vast is the damage Donald Trump has done to the Republican party.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…