Skip to main content

The shameful religious bigotry of Bernie Sanders and Chris Van Hollen

This shameful and bigoted performance by Sen. Bernie Sanders- supported by Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland- is a direct assault on the Constitution and thus a violation of their oath of office. It also represents a threat to our values and our way of life far more serious than any of the frightening things President Trump has said about the First Amendment.

Jesus repeatedly states in the New Testament that salvation is obtained only by faith in Him. There have always been Christians who disagree with Him. In recent decades Roman Catholicism has broken with the apostolic tradition and taught that this might not be the case. Certainly, nobody is required to agree with the clear and consistent teaching of the New Testament. But His words are plain, and they are repeated over and over. Sen. Sanders' attack, and that of Sen. Van Hollen,  thus is not merely an attack on Russell T. Vought, the president's nominee to be Deputy Director of the Office of Management and Budget. Everything they say about Mr. Vought they say about Jesus of Nazareth, and about the consensus of Christian teaching for two thousand years.

Sen. Sanders is Jewish. Sen. Van Hollen is an Episcopalian, a member of a denomination not exactly noted for its orthodoxy and in fact currently under suspension by the worldwide Anglican Communion for violating the teachings of historic Christianity by sanctioning same-sex church marriages. To be charitable (and I think realistic), I believe that the senators have taken their position out of ignorance rather than malice. Very likely neither of them is well acquainted with the teachings of historic Christianity, much less with the New Testament. It's a kind of ignorance that is widespread on the Left, leading to some fairly bizarre applications of the principle of the separation of church and state and grave difficulty for the rest of us in engaging "progressives" in meaningful and intelligent discussions on issues relating to it. That's even before you deal with the fact that, by their logic, it was a violation of the separation of church and state to free the slaves or pass civil rights legislation since the Abolitionist movement and the Civil Rights movement were largely inspired by the Christian convictions of their supporters!

That is an explanation and one that goes a long way toward minimizing the ugliness of the performance the two senators put on at the Senate Budget Committee hearing on Mr. Vought's nomination. But it does not excuse it. Whether they realized or intended it or not, Senators Sanders and Van Hollen have imposed a religious test on public office in violation of Article VI of the U.S. Constitution, and as long as they persist in doing so, they are in violation of their oath of office.

They should be required by the Senate- indeed, by the very American values Sen. Sanders invokes in his perhaps understandable ignorance- to apologize to Mr, Voight and to the millions of American Christians who, whether the senators agree with them or not, have every right to prefer the the teachings of Jesus Christ to beliefs that Senators Sanders and Van Hollen might find more congenial.

There is no place in America for the kind of religious intolerance the two senators displayed toward either Mr. Voight or the rest of us who regard Jesus as a religious authority superior to Sen. Sanders and Sen. Van Hollen.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…