Skip to main content

....Aaaaaand now Mr. Trump UNsays most of what he should have said Saturday!

It's getting pretty hard to be charitable in interpreting President Trump's... er.... verbalizations. 

Yesterday he finally got around to blaming the people actually responsible for the Charlottesville violence, the racists, and the alt-right (who just happen to include some of his most loyal and fanatical supporters).

Today, he stepped in it again, blaming "both sides" and creating out of his imagination "very violent" demonstrators against the statue of Robert E. Lee which was already going to be removed!

We have a delusional president. He makes up "facts" on the spot as the fancy takes him. It is very, very hard not to question his mental health.

Look. I happen to agree that the statue of General Lee should not be removed. Unlike other Confederate figures, Lee worked hard after the war to reconcile not only North and South but white Southerners to the reality that their former slaves were now fellow citizens. Yes, he was a slaveholder. As the president pointed out, so were Washington and Jefferson, and yet nobody is calling for their statues or monuments to be removed. Lee fought not to protect slavery but to protect his native state from invasion by Federal troops. The removal of the statue and the renaming of the Charlottesville park in which it stands is an outrageous case of fanatical political correctness run amok.

Further, the president is absolutely correct in saying that many of the demonstrators against the removal of the statue were fine, law-abiding people who are in no way to blame for the violence. And to his credit, he explicitly repeated his specific condemnation of the racists and white nationalists who WERE the responsible parties. But there is absolutely no evidence of violence by people on the other side.
This pattern of creating an alternate reality off the top of his head to fit whatever agenda he happens to be pursuing at the moment has become so regular and so habitual that it's becoming harder and harder to dismiss it as mere lying. The worrisome possibility is that he really believes that President Obama had him bugged and all the other crazy things he insists are true without any evidence whatsoever.  And a delusional, grandiose president who shows such a radical disconnect with reality is not reassuring. Potential presidential paranoia might be good material for a political novel, but it's not a remotely acceptable reality.

Whether he's just dishonest, irresponsible, and believes that he exempt from accountability (and from the way his supporters react to  his bizarre behavior and utterances such seems to be the case, at least as far as they are concerned) or potentially psychotic, his statement today is was not only factually false but just plain dumb. Having received praise yesterday for at long last condemning the people who were actually responsible for the violence- the racists and white nationalists and other alt-right types who absolutely were not the only people demonstrating against the removal of the statue- he now has decided to commit another unforced error by once again trying to take some of the heat off of them and put it on someone else. Nobody has ever claimed that all the people who were demonstrating against the removal of the statue are racists or white nationalists or alt-right fanatics, or bore any more responsibility for the violence than its victims did. Yet the president's decision to pursue that straw man leaves one wondering just what he was trying to accomplish.

Even while repeating his condemnation of the bigots and fanatics who were, in fact, responsible for the violence, he chose today to take some of the heat off them by trying to make innocent people share the blame- something his critics have not, in fact, done.
Before I finish, a word should be said about the behavior of the journalists at today's press conference. The president was perfectly clear in repeating his condemnation of the racists and alt-right fanatics. Yet it almost seemed as if the reporters hadn't heard him, or had heard the exact opposite. Their behavior is also unreasonable and only adds undue support for the president's attempts to demonize them.

This was not a good press conference for anybody- and least of all, for the facts.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…