Skip to main content

We've lost an honest politician

I was saddened to hear last night of the death on of Michael S. Holewinski on June 19.

When I first met Mike, he was a law student at John Marshall and, like me, an anti-Machine Democratic activist. In those days the Illinois Constitution had a rather clever feature which only those in the know understood or appreciated. Each legislative district had three members. By tradition, neither party would run more than two candidates in any one district, so every citizen of the state always had one member of the Illinois House of his or her own party from his or her own district.

Those third, minority party members were often the most astute, effective, and widely-respected members of the House. But there was another advantage to the system. Every voter was given three votes. In primaries and general elections alike, he or she could cast one vote for each of three candidates, one and a half for two- or all three for a single candidate. This had the effect of making incumbents extremely vulnerable and therefore extraordinarily accountable. All a challenger had to do was to half the number of voters to "bullet-" to cast all three votes for the challenger- as the incumbent shared with the other incumbent of his party for the two to end up tied!

Patrick Quinn, onetime governor of Illinois, began his regrettable career in politics leading a misguided but unfortunately successful drive in 1980 to get rid of multiple member districts. Ironically, Quinn touted this mistake as a money-saving "reform" measure, even though pretty much every "good government" organization in Illinois joined just about every other knowledgeable person in the state in opposing the change. Suffice it to say that it was not an auspicious beginning to Quinn's career, although it was a major victory for the very machine politics Quinn claimed to oppose and for legislative mediocrity to boot.

Mike was one of the several anti-Machine insurgents on Chicago's Northwest Side who decided to exploit the vulnerability to which the system exposed entrenched incumbents in 1974. I worked in that campaign, and I gave my precinct captain quite a scare. Doubtless, Mike's Polish name helped more than my efforts, but I only worked one side of one street- and nevertheless came within a vote and a half of carrying the precinct for Mike!

One of the two Machine legislators and the minority Republican member from our District were solid, effective legislators, and they were returned to office. But Mike beat out the second, less accomplished Machine Democrat, and began his career in the Illinois House from a heavily Machine district.

Two years later a change in Machine tactics- they encouraged "bulleting" for the lesser Machine candidate- backfired. That lesser candidate and Mike emerged as the Democratic nominees, and the other, well-regarded regular ended up being re-elected, of all things, as an independent, beating out our very solid Republican.

Eventually, Mike lost his seat in an election in which there were no notable races higher on the ballot and voter turnout was low. He ran for the City Council from my ward and, although he got the second most votes of any aldermanic candidate in the city, lost to the Machine candidate in our ward, who got the most.

I lost touch with Mike when I went to seminary. He ran unsuccessfully in the primary for one of the county offices, a race I find it hard to imagine that he thought he had any chance of winning. He ended his political career as one of the chief aides to Mayor Harold Washington. Afterward, he was active in the corporate world and practiced property law.

Mike was an honest, idealistic guy of the kind that era often produced. He brought ethics, intelligence, and class to politics in my city and state, I often remember him when I'm tempted to become cynical about our system. He was living proof that good and honorable people can be successful in politics

We need more like him, and Chicago, Illinois, and all of us are poorer for his passing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…