Skip to main content

'Trade wars. Huh. What are they good for? Absolutely NUTHIN'!'

The Trump administration has announced $200 billion in new tariffs on Chinese goods.

The Chinese- terming the action "unacceptable" and calling the U.S. policy "bullying-" are threatening to respond in kind.

Despite the president's historically illiterate remark on Twitter that "trade wars are easy to win," nobody generally wins them. All parties are hurt economically because the balance of trade is worsened by them rather than improved. It was one thing when Mr. Trump was simply trying to take credit for the Obama economic recovery and the continued progress of an economy which was actually growing at a faster rate, with unemployment decreasing at a faster rate, on the day Mr. Obama left office than it is today. But as I and many others feared would happen during the campaign, when Mr. Trump was hinting at a protectionist trade policy, he has set us on a road that almost inevitably will take us back into recession.

Events continue to unfold as I feared they would, and if they continue on this course they will plunge us into another recession. After the recession of 2008 devastated our economy on a Republican president's watch, it's looking more and more like what I feared would result from Mr. Trump's election will take place. By 2020, the Republicans may no longer be a viable political party- and, as I feared would be the case back in 2016, the price of Donald Trump's election will turn out to be that the ideology of Hillary Clinton will no longer have any practical opposition and will run rampant with neither let nor hindrance for the foreseeable future.

Somebody grab a dictionary and look up "Pyrrhic victory."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"The Handmaid's Tale" is stupid

No, Elizabeth Moss. Restricting the ability of American women to sentence their unborn children to death on a whim would not transform the United States into the misogynistic nightmare The Handmaid's Tale calls "the Republic of Gilead."

Neither Margaret Atwood's silly, paranoid tale about the Christians who are coming to get you or Hulu's adaptation of it is "timely" (Washington Post), "chillingly real" (San Francisco Chronicle), or  has any special "relevance to Trump's America" except insofar as through it the disconnect between reality and the lurid imaginations of the cultural left have demonstrated yet again that our delusional president isn't the only one who is bonkers.

No. The Christians are not out to get you. Not even the Fundamentalists. You could make a pretty good case that the "progressives" are, though.

If you go to a public university, you had better agree with the left or you will be in danger of n…

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…