Even by "pro-choice" standards, New York State's radical new abortion law is an abomination

Ok. Satan's Kingdom State Recreation Area is actually in Connecticut. But in view of New York's new abortion law, perhaps it should relinquish its name in favor of the entire Empire State.

In case you haven't heard, the New York legislature has passed, and Gov. Andrew Cuomo has signed, the Reproductive Health Act, a law legalizing abortion literally up to the moment of birth. The far left will object that this applies only when the mother's health is threatened. That objection is disingenuous. Past experience has shown that the very elastic category of mental health is often used as a legal dodge in such cases, and not necessarily even in cases of what otherwise might be diagnosed as clinical depression.

Stress, perhaps, might do as legal justification for aborting a full-term fetus. Or just the idea that giving birth to a full-term fetus might make the mother sad or anxious.

Federal law protects the life of infants who have actually been born, even as the result of failed abortions.  One may with reason ask whether there is any significant ethical difference between such a child and a nine-month fetus.  To all intents and purposes, the abortion of a fetus who could survive outside the womb and infanticide is purely rhetorical. Traditionally, this has been understood as being 24 weeks from the mother's last menstrual period; a new study has found that, with aggressive post-natal care, some newborns can survive as early as 22 weeks.

To put this into perspective, a recent Marist University poll found that 75% of Americans- including 60% of Democrats and 61% of those who consider themselves "pro-choice-" believe that abortion should be restricted to at most the first trimester. The radical New York law Gov. Cuomo has just signed lies outside the traditional debate over abortion. It legalizes something which nearly two-thirds of "pro-choice" Americans think is wrong.

Every year since Roe v. Wade was handed down, Gallup has conducted an annual poll asking the American people whether they believed that abortion should be legal in all circumstances, legal only in certain circumstances, or illegal in all circumstances. While one would never know it from the rhetoric of either the left or the left-leaning media, the poll has nearly always shown that a clear majority favored either the restriction or the outright banning of abortion. But the Reproductive Health Act carries abortion law in New York even further beyond our national consensus.

But there's more. Under the new law, one need not be a doctor to perform an abortion. Other health professionals can, too It might possibly be argued that paramedical professionals often have the necessary skills to do so without endangering the very health of the mother the new law uses as legal justification for full-term abortions. But the critical point is that the law removes abortion from the category of criminal law entirely. In December, a man in Saratoga County, New York was arrested for punching a woman who was 26 weeks pregnant in the stomach in an attempt to induce a miscarriage. The man was charged with a felony, abortion in the second degree. But the Catholic News Service reports that under the new law, no felony charges could be brought. It seems that misdemeanor assault would be the most serious charge to which he would have been liable. And since abortion even by a non-health professional is no longer governed by criminal law in New York State, it would indeed seem to follow that even a non-medical professional cannot be criminally prosecuted for performing it.

The back-alley abortionists whom pro-abortion advocates often cite as a justification for legalized abortion would seem to be back in business under the new law. On what planet, even by pro-abortion standards, is this an advancement?

This is a big deal. There will no doubt be efforts by the far left to minimize the negative impact of the new law, and they will often no doubt misrepresent the facts. But the most basic and undeniable fact is that the legislation is in even more violent opposition to our communal ethics and the American ethical consensus than is Roe. And it vividly illustrates why, as hateful and immoral as the agenda of the Trump administration is, the Democratic party does not offer a viable alternative.

Both parties are in thrall to extreme elements which lie outside the mainstream of American thought and conscience.

Comments

Popular Posts